WINDLOADS.AI
Start a review
Patent-pending testing review technology

Built to read the package the way the test will challenge it.

Averroes reviews mock-up drawings and testing protocols together so consequential questions are visible before fabrication.

Start a review See the review path
Patent pendingTesting-package review technology
Decision focusedPriority gaps, boundaries, and next actions
Florida approvalsRelevant issued drawings and evaluations
Miami-DadeImpact-market requirement depth
AIR ASTM E283/E283MWATER ASTM E331 + E547STRUCTURAL ASTM E330/E330MIMPACT ASTM E1886 + E1996HVHZ TAS 201 + 202 + 203
Window specimen undergoing a large-missile impact test
SUBMITTED PACKAGEKeep the review centered on the proposed test scope.
01 / DEFINE

Start with what the physical test must prove.

  • Testing program and product scope
  • Applicable public standards and approvals
  • Project-specific acceptance requirements
Illustrative facade connection review
REVIEW PRIORITIES

SCOPEDefined

GAPSVisible

ACTIONSRanked

Customer-facing findings stay focused on decisions.
02 / REVIEW

Surface the questions that could change the outcome.

  • Priority risks and unresolved conditions
  • Questions that need project-team confirmation
  • Limits on what can responsibly be concluded
Instrumented glass specimen after an impact test
Decision supportResolve before fabricationKeep findings within the submitted scope
03 / ACT

Return practical next actions.

The result is a concise review path that helps the project team decide what to confirm, revise, document, or escalate before committing to the physical specimen.

Responsible boundaries

Keep conclusions within the available information.

Averroes distinguishes confirmed project information from open questions and clearly states when professional review is still required.

  1. 01Scope The review stays within the product, configuration, and test program submitted by the customer.
  2. 02Sources Public standards and project documents are identified where they affect a customer-facing conclusion.
  3. 03Uncertainty Missing or conflicting information remains visible instead of being silently assumed.
  4. 04Judgment Preliminary guidance does not replace the required licensed-professional decision.